Animation Film Studies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Animation Film Studies - Essay ExampleThis narration suspensors to understand the universal world in an interceptive manner with the perception of the narrator. Narration is contrary in different media. The narration in Cinema is different from that of in books, history and psychology. This is due to the motion icon it involves during narration. As the motion picture is absent in books and psychology, the narration need to be a little bit dramatic to gain a mark on the mind of the poster. This is not the case with books, where the standard of the narration is crucial to adjudicate the standard of the effect on the mind of the reader. Due to this the narration in film will help the viewer to fall upon all the worlds stories within a single structure framed by combine effort of script, director and other production team. According to Roland Barthes, the extracting from each tale its model, then out of these models do great narrative structure by reapplying is exhausting and u ndesirable. While stating this he is opposing individual models for different tales that diversify the cinema narration. This statement supports the narration of worlds stories under a single structure like ascetics see the whole landscape in a single bean. There are enough doubts about the stiffness of the statement when the tales of different cultures and different environments are considered. Do single structure for cinema narration holds rock-steady for different tales of different environments and cultures. This statement is made While Roland Barthes talks bout reality. When we consider same reality, fit to Robin Wood, Metz is being insufficiently concrete and excessively concerned about abstract proposals. This abstractness, according to the view of Robin wood, will decrease the standard of reality. The naturality in narration of certain films and singularity in the be of the text made number of critics like robin wood to criticise the works of Christian Metz. They confi nes the works as exploitation of filmic analysis. The abstract theories of Metz are opposite to cohesion and structure of the film enchantment considering the film as representation or as a world. While making these comments or criticism, at that place is no reference about reality. Affecting the reality is affecting the truth. The truth of film cannot be show through Metzs system of narration as they are being more abstract. So according to critics of Metz, too much abstractness may affect truth or reality in terms of ordinary understanding. In this case, there should be different structures to different types of stories that give completely different conclusions. The film may pop out in the form of obsession and desire if the narration is too abstract. One cannot tally obsession or desire with truth as the desire will be truth if it is fulfilled. So the desires cannot be express in narration of cinema Do they effect the reality of the narration involved These are the question s to be answered while considering or criticising the abstractness of Metz and his theories. This type of criticism is due to the virulence with which Metz has been criticised is not due to lack of grandness to structure of narration in the film but the abstract nature and too much organics he contrary. The opposing of organics or naturality is due to the emphasis on abstractness and he may not directly opposed the reality or naturality but the abstract sounding of his theories might have affected the